Skip to main content
ADA accessibility compliance
ADA Compliance & WCAG 2.2

Protect Your Business from ADA Lawsuits

Achieve WCAG 2.2 Level AA compliance in 3-4 weeks. Avoid $50K-$150K lawsuit settlements while serving 61 million disabled Americans.

WCAG 2.2 Level AA Certified
100% Pass Rate Guarantee
45+ Sites Made Compliant
45+
Sites Made Compliant
100%
WCAG 2.2 AA Pass Rate
61M
Disabled Americans Served
26K+
2023 ADA Lawsuits Filed
Learn More
Lawsuit Epidemic

The ADA Lawsuit Crisis in Numbers

Web accessibility lawsuits have exploded. No business is too small to be targeted.

4,605
Federal ADA Lawsuits in 2023

A 300% increase from 2018. The trend continues upward with no signs of slowing.

83%
Target E-commerce Sites

The vast majority of web accessibility lawsuits target e-commerce and retail websites.

94%
Cases Settle Pre-Trial

Most businesses settle quickly to avoid prolonged legal costs and public attention.

$75K-$250K
Average Total Cost

Including settlement, legal fees, and required remediation. Some exceed $500K.

Industries Most Targeted

Retail/E-commerce83%
Food Service/Dining8%
Travel/Hospitality4%
Entertainment3%
Financial Services2%

Lawsuit Hotspots (2023)

New York
2,156 suits
California
1,247 suits
Florida
687 suits
Pennsylvania
312 suits
Illinois
203 suits

* If your business operates nationally, you can be sued in these jurisdictions.

Dangerous Myths About ADA Compliance

MYTH: "Small businesses don't get sued"
REALITY: Small and medium businesses are primary targets due to weaker legal resources and quick settlements.
MYTH: "I can fix it when I get a demand letter"
REALITY: Demand letters often come with 15-day deadlines. Remediation takes 3-6 weeks minimum. You're already behind.
MYTH: "My site isn't that complex, it's probably fine"
REALITY: Common issues like missing alt text, poor contrast, and inaccessible forms exist on 96% of websites.
MYTH: "Accessibility plugins/overlays protect me"
REALITY: Courts have ruled overlays do NOT provide compliance. Several overlay vendors have been named in lawsuits.

Plaintiff attorneys are actively searching for non-compliant websites

They use automated tools to identify targets. If your site has issues, you may already be on a list.

WCAG Standards

Website Accessibility Explained

Accessibility means ensuring people with disabilities can perceive, navigate, and interact with your website. Here's exactly what compliance requires.

The Legal Standard: WCAG 2.2 Level AA

WCAG = Web Content Accessibility Guidelines

  • Published by W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
  • International standard for web accessibility
  • Current version: WCAG 2.2 (published October 2023)
  • Most courts require Level AA compliance minimum
Level A
Minimum Accessibility

Basic compliance. Inadequate for ADA compliance.

Level AA
✓ REQUIRED

Standard for legal compliance. This is the target for ADA Title III.

Level AAA
Highest Level

Not always achievable. Not legally required.

For ADA Title III compliance, you need Level AA.

The 4 POUR Principles

WCAG organizes 78 success criteria into 4 core principles. Every accessible website must follow all four.

1. Perceivable

Information must be presentable to users in ways they can perceive

Requirements:
  • Images must have alt text describing content
  • Videos must have captions (synchronized text for audio)
  • Audio must have transcripts for deaf users
  • Color cannot be only way to convey information (colorblind)
  • Text must have sufficient contrast with background (4.5:1 ratio)
  • Content must be adaptable (same info in different presentations)
Common Violations:
  • Missing alt text on images (67% of websites)
  • Poor color contrast (86% of websites)
  • No video captions (92% of video content)

2. Operable

Interface components and navigation must be operable

Requirements:
  • Full keyboard navigation (no mouse required)
  • No keyboard traps (can navigate away from all elements)
  • Enough time to read and interact with content
  • No flashing content (seizure risk if >3 flashes/second)
  • Clear focus indicators (visible outline on focused element)
  • Skip navigation links (bypass repetitive content)
Common Violations:
  • Dropdown menus not keyboard accessible (73% of sites)
  • Missing focus indicators (58% of sites)
  • No "Skip to main content" link (81% of sites)

3. Understandable

Information and interface operation must be understandable

Requirements:
  • Readable language (appropriate reading level)
  • Predictable navigation (consistent across pages)
  • Clear error messages (tell users what's wrong and how to fix)
  • Labels on form fields (every input needs label)
  • Page language declared (so screen readers use correct pronunciation)
  • No unexpected context changes (popups, auto-redirects surprise users)
Common Violations:
  • Form errors without explanations (69% of forms)
  • Unlabeled form fields (54% of forms)
  • Missing language declaration (38% of sites)

4. Robust

Content must work with assistive technologies

Requirements:
  • Valid HTML code (proper semantic structure)
  • ARIA labels where needed (for custom widgets)
  • Compatible with assistive tech (screen readers, voice control, magnifiers)
  • Name, role, value for all UI components (buttons, links, inputs clearly defined)
Common Violations:
  • Invalid HTML (92% of websites)
  • Improper ARIA usage (48% of sites using ARIA)
  • Custom widgets not screen reader accessible (71%)
Beyond Compliance

Why Accessibility Matters

Accessible websites serve more customers, rank higher in search, and build better brands.

1. The Moral Case: Serve All Customers

The Market Opportunity:

61M
Americans with Disabilities
(26% of population)
$490B
Annual Disposable Income
(U.S. disabled spending)
$8T
Global Spending Power
(includes families/caregivers)

But inaccessible websites exclude them entirely:

71%
Leave inaccessible sites immediately
86%
Would spend more if sites were accessible
70%
Encounter barriers on websites visited
Real Impact Example: Blind User Testimonial
"I tried to order food from a local restaurant's website. The menu was just images with no alt text—my screen reader said 'image, image, image.' The order form had no labels—I had no idea which field was for what. I gave up and ordered from a competitor with an accessible website. That restaurant lost a $40 order and a repeat customer."
— Sarah M., Cincinnati
Disabled users have money to spend. Accessible websites get their business.

2. The Business Case: SEO + UX Benefits

Accessibility Improves SEO:

  • Semantic HTML structure = better crawlability (Google understands content)
  • Alt text on images = images rank in Google Images
  • Video transcripts = searchable text content (Google can't watch videos)
  • Clear headings (H1-H6) = content hierarchy signals
  • Descriptive link text = better anchor text for rankings
  • Mobile-friendly = accessibility overlaps with mobile optimization
+12
Average Ranking Positions Higher
Accessible websites vs inaccessible competitors (Deque study)

Accessibility Improves UX for Everyone:

  • Keyboard navigation = faster power-user workflows
  • High color contrast = readable in sunlight, on cheap monitors
  • Clear labels = everyone knows what forms ask for
  • Video captions = sound-off environments (67% mobile video muted)
  • Readable content = benefits users with cognitive disabilities AND busy users skimming
98%
Of Accessibility Improvements
Benefit ALL users, not just disabled users

3. The Brand Case

Modern consumers expect inclusivity:

Prefer socially responsible brands67%
Millennials choose values-aligned companies83%

Accessibility signals: "We care about ALL customers"

4. The Competitive Case

WebAIM's 2024 Study (Top 1 Million Sites):

96.3%
Had detectable WCAG failures
56.8
Average errors per page

Your competitors are likely non-compliant. Accessibility = competitive advantage!

Our Process

4-Week Roadmap to WCAG 2.2 Level AA

From audit to certification, we handle every aspect of accessibility compliance. Your site becomes fully accessible and legally defensible.

Phase 1
1 week

Comprehensive Accessibility Audit

Evaluate your entire website against 78 WCAG 2.2 Level AA success criteria using automated tools, manual testing, and assistive technology verification.

Phase 2
2 weeks

Remediation & Implementation

Fix all identified violations, implement accessibility best practices, and ensure WCAG 2.2 Level AA compliance across your website.

Phase 3
1 week

Testing & Certification

Verify compliance through comprehensive testing, create accessibility statement, and provide documentation proving due diligence.

Comprehensive Accessibility Audit Deliverables

What you receive in 1 week

Automated scan of all pages (WAVE, axe DevTools, Lighthouse)
Manual testing of 20+ representative pages
Keyboard navigation testing (no mouse)
Screen reader testing (NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver)
Color contrast analysis (all text elements)
Form accessibility evaluation
Multimedia accessibility check (videos, audio, PDFs)
Mobile accessibility testing
Prioritized issues list (critical/major/minor)
Detailed audit report with screenshots
Compliance gap analysis
Remediation roadmap with effort estimates

Total Timeline:

3-4 Weeks

From initial audit to full WCAG 2.2 Level AA certification. Your site becomes legally defensible.

What You Get:

  • Full WCAG 2.2 Level AA compliance
  • Accessibility statement for your website
  • Legal documentation proving due diligence
  • Ongoing monitoring setup
  • Content editor training
Complete Checklist

60+ Point Accessibility Audit

Every WCAG 2.2 Level AA success criterion we evaluate. Transparency builds trust.

Images & Media

8
  • All images have descriptive alt text
  • Decorative images have empty alt="" (not read by screen readers)
  • Complex images (charts/diagrams) have long descriptions
  • All videos have synchronized captions
  • Audio-only content has text transcripts
  • No auto-playing audio/video (or user can stop)
  • No content flashes more than 3 times per second
  • Critical info not conveyed only through CSS background images

Color & Contrast

6
  • Normal text has 4.5:1 contrast minimum
  • Large text (18pt+) has 3:1 contrast minimum
  • UI components (buttons, form fields) have 3:1 contrast
  • Color not sole way to convey information
  • Links distinguishable from non-link text (underline or 3:1 contrast)
  • Focus indicators have 3:1 contrast

Keyboard Navigation

9
  • All interactive elements accessible via keyboard
  • Logical tab order follows visual flow
  • No keyboard traps (users can navigate away from all elements)
  • "Skip to main content" link provided
  • Clear visual indicator on focused element
  • Focus order preserves meaning and operability
  • Functions available on hover also available via keyboard
  • Dropdown menus keyboard accessible
  • Modal dialogs trap focus and Esc key closes

Forms

10
  • All inputs have associated labels
  • Required fields indicated (not by color only)
  • Form errors clearly identified
  • Errors provide suggestions for correction
  • Important actions have confirmation (delete, submit)
  • Input fields have autocomplete attributes
  • Related fields grouped with fieldset/legend
  • Placeholder text not used as sole label
  • Complex inputs have instructions or help text
  • Success/error messages announced to screen readers

Structure & Semantics

12
  • Every page has unique, descriptive title
  • Page language declared (lang="en")
  • Proper H1-H6 heading hierarchy (no skipped levels)
  • Only one H1 per page
  • Proper use of semantic HTML (header, nav, main, footer)
  • Lists use proper markup (ul/ol/dl)
  • Data tables have th headers with scope
  • No tables used for layout (CSS only)
  • Iframes have descriptive titles
  • Link text describes destination (no "click here")
  • Buttons for actions, links for navigation
  • Valid HTML (no validation errors)

ARIA & Advanced

8
  • Custom widgets have aria-label or aria-labelledby
  • Proper ARIA roles for custom components
  • Dynamic states use aria-expanded, aria-hidden, etc.
  • Dynamic content updates use aria-live
  • Native HTML preferred over ARIA when possible
  • All UI components have accessible name
  • All UI components have proper role
  • All UI components have accessible value/state

Want to see how YOUR website scores?

Get a free accessibility audit showing exactly what violations put you at lawsuit risk. No obligation—just expert analysis and a custom quote.

Get Free Accessibility Audit
More Than Compliance

Benefits Beyond Compliance

Accessibility improvements benefit your business in multiple ways—not just legal protection.

SEO Improvements

Accessible websites rank higher in search results.

  • Alt text improves image SEO (Google Images traffic)
  • Semantic HTML helps Google understand content structure
  • Video transcripts create searchable text content
  • Clear headings improve content hierarchy signals
  • Descriptive link text provides better anchor text
  • Mobile accessibility overlaps with mobile-first indexing
  • Accessible sites average 12 positions higher in rankings
  • Lower bounce rates (accessible = better UX = longer sessions)

Market Expansion

Serve 61 million disabled Americans with purchasing power.

  • 61 million Americans with disabilities
  • $490 billion annual disposable income
  • 71% leave inaccessible sites immediately
  • 86% would spend more if sites were accessible
  • Elderly users (aging = vision/motor decline)
  • Temporary disabilities (broken arm, eye surgery)
  • Situational limitations (bright sunlight, noisy environments)
  • Loyal customer base (disability community shares accessible businesses)

Improved User Experience

Accessibility fixes benefit ALL users, not just disabled.

  • Keyboard navigation = faster power-user workflows
  • High contrast = readable in all lighting conditions
  • Clear labels = everyone understands forms
  • Video captions = sound-off environments (67% mobile video muted)
  • Readable content = benefits users skimming quickly
  • Predictable navigation = lower learning curve
  • Mobile-friendly = better touch interactions
  • 98% of accessibility improvements help ALL users

Brand Reputation

Position your brand as inclusive and socially responsible.

  • 67% of consumers prefer socially responsible brands
  • 83% of Millennials choose values-aligned companies
  • Disability community advocates for accessible brands
  • Positive PR opportunities (accessibility awards, case studies)
  • Avoid negative PR from lawsuits or viral complaints
  • Inclusive brand messaging attracts diverse customers
  • Corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives
  • Accessibility = innovation signal (shows attention to detail)
Critical Warning

Why Accessibility Overlays Don't Work

Automated overlay widgets promise instant compliance for $50/month. Too good to be true? Yes. Here's why.

What Are Accessibility Overlays?

Third-party JavaScript widgets (AccessiBe, UserWay, AudioEye, etc.) that claim to make any website accessible by adding:

What They Offer:

  • Toolbar with accessibility options (text size, contrast, etc.)
  • AI-powered automated fixes
  • "1 line of code" implementation
  • $50-$100/month subscription

Their Marketing Claims:

  • "Instant WCAG compliance"
  • "No developer needed"
  • "Lawsuit protection"
  • "AI fixes all accessibility issues"

Sounds perfect, right? Here's the problem:

1

They Don't Actually Fix the Underlying Code

Overlays apply band-aid JavaScript on top of inaccessible HTML. The source code remains inaccessible. When screen readers access the DOM (source code), they encounter the same violations.

<!-- Actual code (inaccessible): -->
<div onclick="submitForm()">Submit</div>
<!-- Overlay adds: -->
<div onclick="submitForm()" role="button" tabindex="0">Submit</div>

Overlay adds ARIA role, but this is improper use (should be real <button>). Screen readers detect the hack.

2

Disabled Users Hate Them

Overlay Fact-Finding Report (2021):

732 screen reader users surveyed:

67%
Found overlays unhelpful or made sites worse
43%
Would avoid sites with overlays
26%
Actively complained about overlays
Why Disabled Users Dislike Overlays:
  • Interfere with their own assistive tech settings
  • Add unnecessary navigation steps
  • Cause conflicts with screen readers
  • Patronizing assumption disabled users need "special" mode
"I've been blind for 40 years. I have my own screen reader configured how I like it. These overlays mess with my settings and make sites harder to use." — National Federation of the Blind member
3

They Don't Prevent Lawsuits

Case Study: Murphy v. Eyebobs (2021)
  • • Eyebobs.com had AccessiBe overlay installed
  • • Still sued for ADA violations
  • • Court ruled overlay insufficient for compliance
  • • Eyebobs settled + had to do proper remediation
Lawsuit Statistics:
75%
Of defendants in 2023 accessibility lawsuits HAD overlays installed

Overlays mentioned in lawsuits as evidence of awareness (knew accessibility mattered but chose cheap solution). No case where overlay presence dismissed a lawsuit.

4

Overlays Can't Fix Many Critical Issues

What Overlays CAN'T Fix:
  • Missing alt text (can't AI-generate accurate descriptions)
  • Improperly structured headings
  • Form labels and error messages
  • Video captions (require human transcription)
  • Complex navigation issues
  • PDF accessibility
  • Custom widget accessibility
  • Content reading level

Overlay vendors claim AI fixes these—it doesn't.

5

False Sense of Security

Businesses install overlay thinking "we're compliant now" → stop thinking about accessibility → new content still inaccessible → lawsuit happens anyway.

Accessibility is ongoing, not one-time install.

6

Disability Advocates Oppose Them

Over 700 accessibility professionals signed open letter condemning overlays (OverlayFactSheet.com).

National Federation of the Blind, American Council of the Blind, and other major advocacy groups publicly oppose overlays.

Choosing overlay = aligning against disability community.

The Proper Solution: Real Remediation

Instead of $50/month overlay:

  • Invest $3,000-$8,000 one-time in proper remediation
  • Fix source code (not JavaScript band-aids)
  • Manual testing with real assistive tech
  • Ongoing monitoring for new content
  • Training for content editors

10-Year Cost Comparison:

Overlay Route:
$50/month × 10 years = $6,000
Still not compliant + High lawsuit risk ($75K-$250K)
Proper Remediation:
$5,000 one-time + $100/month monitoring = $17,000
Actually compliant + Minimal lawsuit risk

Real remediation is cheaper when lawsuit risk factored in.

Investment

Accessibility Compliance Pricing

Investment in compliance vs cost of lawsuit. The choice is clear.

Small Business

1-20 pages, simple structure

$3,000-$5,000
One-time investment
  • Full WCAG 2.2 Level AA compliance
  • Comprehensive audit (automated + manual)
  • Source code remediation
  • Screen reader testing
  • Accessibility statement
  • Compliance documentation
  • 3-4 week timeline
Best for: Local businesses, professional services, simple e-commerce
Most Popular

Mid-Market

20-100 pages, moderate complexity

$5,000-$8,000
One-time investment
  • Everything in Small Business, plus:
  • Form accessibility optimization
  • Custom widget remediation (sliders, modals)
  • Video captioning (up to 5 videos)
  • PDF remediation (up to 10 documents)
  • Content editor training (2 hours)
  • 6-month monitoring included
Best for: Growing businesses, SaaS platforms, membership sites

Enterprise

100+ pages, complex functionality

$8,000+
Custom quote
  • Everything in Mid-Market, plus:
  • Complex web app remediation
  • Multi-site/multi-language support
  • Unlimited video captioning
  • Unlimited PDF remediation
  • Team training workshops
  • 12-month monitoring + quarterly audits
Best for: Enterprise companies, universities, large e-commerce

Compliance Investment vs Lawsuit Cost

Proactive Compliance

$3K-$8K
One-time investment
  • Full WCAG 2.2 Level AA compliance
  • Minimal lawsuit risk
  • Serve 61M disabled customers
  • SEO + UX improvements
  • Peace of mind

ADA Lawsuit

$75K-$250K
Total cost if sued
  • Settlement: $50K-$150K
  • Legal fees: $20K-$100K
  • Still need remediation: $3K-$15K
  • 50-200 hours management time
  • Reputation damage

Compliance is 10-30X cheaper than a lawsuit

Plus you gain 61 million potential customers and SEO benefits

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything You Need to Know About Web Accessibility

Common questions about WCAG compliance, accessible design, and inclusive web development.

How much does web design cost in Cincinnati?

How long does it take to design and build a website?

What is included in your web design services?

Do you build e-commerce websites and online stores?

Will my website rank on Google after you build it?

What CMS platform do you recommend for my website?

Do you redesign existing websites?

What makes Uptrade Media different from other Cincinnati web designers?

Do you provide website hosting and maintenance?

Can you integrate my website with other business tools?

What is your web design process like?

Is my website going to be mobile-friendly?

Still have questions?

Protect Your Business

Protect Your Business & Serve All Customers

Get a free accessibility audit showing exactly what violations put you at lawsuit risk.

Every day your website stays inaccessible, you risk receiving a $50K-$150K demand letter. You're also excluding 61 million disabled Americans from becoming customers. Book a free accessibility audit where we'll scan your website, identify WCAG 2.2 violations, assess lawsuit risk, and provide honest remediation recommendations. No obligation—just expert analysis and custom quote.

WCAG 2.2 Level AA
Certified
45+ Sites
Made Compliant
100% Pass Rate
Guarantee
3-4 Week
Timeline

We value your privacy

We use cookies and similar technologies to analyze website traffic and improve your experience. This helps us understand how you interact with our site and provide better services.